I
took this photo yesterday, on a walk in the woods. When I realized that I hadn’t focused
properly (or at all) I took a second picture of the same view, but upon seeing
the in-focus version I realized that the view hadn’t been worth the picture in
the first place. The completely fuzzy
and unfocused version was much more interesting.
As
you can see, it isn’t really a picture at all.
I just captured some light. But I
wonder if that wasn’t the point after all.
We
see the world through a camera – everyone does, including you, and you can’t
help it at all. You are your own camera,
and you see the world in a very particular way, and you send these very
particular snapshots to yourself for review to see what you can make of the
things around you. Sometimes your view
is unique because you choose to look at things that other people don’t, and
sometimes it’s just because when you look, you think about what you see in a
way that no one else thinks. I think
that most of the problems that people have with other people have to do with
their cameras.
My
camera is a Canon Rebel – my actual camera, the machine I use – but my personal
camera – the one I use every moment that I’m awake – is a very individualized
model. I think every person should take
a good while to figure out what model his own camera is – that is to say, he
should figure out how he sees the world – and he should always remember that
everyone else’s camera is of a different make.
It helps a lot when you realize that so much of disagreeing happens when
people are looking at two different pictures taken from two different angles by
two completely different people. Your
camera is as unique as you are – that is to say, yours is the only one of its
kind.
It
is of course very inconvenient that everyone’s views are so dissimilar. It doesn’t really matter when we’re looking
at separate things, but it starts to cause trouble when we all look the same
direction and half of us see green and the other half see blue. And the really crazy people see yellow. Or maybe they’re the only ones seeing it
correctly.
In
my Anthropology class today, the professor read us excerpts from an essay
called “Body Ritual Among the Nacirema.”
It’s a satirical piece written fifty years ago by an
anthropologist. Anthropologists are
weird, but they are some of the few people who understand that the differences
between cameras matter. If you cross
your eyes at the world “Nacirema,” you’ll realize that it’s “American” spelled
backwards. The essay describes some very
familiar parts of American culture from the perspective of someone who doesn’t
quite understand what’s going on. This
confused observer thinks that the bathroom sink is some kind of holy fount
where people go to worship. In the
context of the essay, it actually makes a certain kind of sense. People assume some very surprising things
about what they don’t understand.
Some
people talk about not being able to see things clearly because they’re “too
close to it.” I don’t know if closeness
matters so much. I think the problem
might be that we see it too clearly. Our pictures are too much in focus. As I said, the view in the picture above
wasn’t very interesting. But there was a
very interesting pattern of color and light in it that I would not have seen if
I had focused correctly in the first place.
It’s
impossible for me to see through someone else’s camera. I can have them tell me how they see the
world, and I might understand it if they explained it well, but I’ll never
actually see the way they see. On a case
to case basis, I want to know what certain people’s cameras are like. I am pretty familiar with my husband’s
camera, which is very helpful to me. For
most people, I’ll never really know why they don’t see exactly what I see. But I can let things slide out of focus. Sometimes the lack of clarity can be very
revealing.
You
can be an outsider in your own world.
Just cross your eyes.
No comments:
Post a Comment